propellor.cabal claims that propellor is licensed under the 3-clause BSD license. debian/copyright says it's licensed under the 2-clause BSD license. Which is correct? An ftp-master noticed. Thanks. --spwhitton
propellor.cabal
debian/copyright
fixed --Joey
It's 2-clause, see LICENSE.
Cabal file license fields are too restricted syntax to be more than a general indication of license in general I think.
It's 2-clause, see LICENSE.
Cabal file license fields are too restricted syntax to be more than a general indication of license in general I think.